Why Transhumanism Is Not Private Property

Transhumanism (H+), has made some progress recently. Well, at least progress in creating careers, generating PhD theses, raising money and generally attempting to become mainstream. Indeed, I would not be surprised if as much as 1% of the educated population have heard of it. However, a price has to be paid and it seems to be that of giving up H+ and even in some cases appearing to oppose its traditional goals. The techniques of doing so involve a weird kind of cognitive dissonance.

On one hand all the grand visions of artificial intelligence, uploading, raising the dead, re-engineering the cosmos and creating new species of PostHumans are being downplayed as somewhat embarrassing fantasies. Even the term “Transhumanism” is being dropped while at the same time those doing the dropping appear to want to exert a stranglehold on how it is defined. On the other, the big money spinner seems to be playing up the dangers and offering to protect the public from us crazies. Meanwhile, the attitude is one of “responsible” commentary which is shorthand for not rocking the boat and upsetting the gravy train, to mix metaphors. Those who do are castigated for every crime one can imagine, especially if the subject touches upon taboo mixes of H+ and non-mainstream politics, religion, sex, drugs and maybe even rock’n’roll (well, I exaggerate the latter…).

There is also disdain for muddying the pure waters of H+ by “dumbing it down” and attempting to seek an audience that is wider than the existing H+ community (an oxymoron). It seems nobody should have an opinion on anything unless it is rubber stamped by one of the “traditional” orgs as well as the author having a PhD in an approved subject. The fear seems to be that H+ is being adopted by politically incorrect “extremists” who might frighten normal people, or rather, wealthy normal people aka “cash cows”. We also have a kind of censorship-by-pressure where prominent members of dissenting organizations (e.g. Zero State) are taken aside for a “quiet word” (and occasionally not so quiet) and told to reign in the crazies. At least it is better than in the past, where there were only a couple of big organizations and all they had to do was kick someone off their mailing list in order to shut them up for breaking the unwritten rules.

Well here is the good, or bad, news. It’s not going to happen. The crazies are loose and are not going back into their cages. Transhumanism is not going to stay defined by the old WTA or ExI documents. Indeed, there is considerable opposition in some quarters to the definition of the name itself as meaning “Transitional Humanism”. There is nothing inherently H+ about Humanism as a philosophy – it’s the tech that matters. I rather like “Transcending Humanity” as an alternative. It’s memetic warfare and may Darwin be the referee. We want to move H+ into every niche of Human society as well as the mainstream, and the easiest and most responsive sectors are always the extremists, because they are the people who actually want to change the world. But it’s going to be our Transhumanism that expands. Not the “ethical” politically correct, watered down, apologetic, suit and tie, version now on sale for $$$.

And we have one final word on the matter – The future of Transhumanism is not Transhumanists.

Dirk Bruere

Attended Nottingham University and later what is now Westminster University, and has a BSc in Physics. Subsequently pursued a career in electronics and computer research and is a research engineer at Surface Measurement Systems. A founder member of Zero State (ZS) and a member of the Futurists Board of the Lifeboat Foundation. Founder of The Consensus in 2002CE, a political party with a core philosophy of Transhumanism, which has been influential in Zero State and the Wave. Other interests include the interface between technology and theology explored in the books TechnoMage and The Praxis, and was co-presenter of a UK radio show, OneTribe. Head of The Praxis, a ZS spiritual organization. For several years held the position of Branch Master in the World Shorinji Kempo Organization, teaching Zen and martial arts, although is now retired from a teaching role.

More Posts

About Dirk Bruere 21 Articles
Attended Nottingham University and later what is now Westminster University, and has a BSc in Physics. Subsequently pursued a career in electronics and computer research and is a research engineer at Surface Measurement Systems. A founder member of Zero State (ZS) and a member of the Futurists Board of the Lifeboat Foundation. Founder of The Consensus in 2002CE, a political party with a core philosophy of Transhumanism, which has been influential in Zero State and the Wave. Other interests include the interface between technology and theology explored in the books TechnoMage and The Praxis, and was co-presenter of a UK radio show, OneTribe. Head of The Praxis, a ZS spiritual organization. For several years held the position of Branch Master in the World Shorinji Kempo Organization, teaching Zen and martial arts, although is now retired from a teaching role.

3 Comments

  1. I don’t know in how far the concept of “property” can be applied to a concept, but if there is a property right, it is ALWAYS private.

    There is no such thing as “collective ownership”. Whoever controls something is the owner, period.

    The very concept of “collective” anything is abhorrent!

    Nazism, Communism, Islam spring to mind – the worst horrors the world has seen.

    Long live PRIVATE PROPERTY!

    • Property rights can be other than private eg GNU General Public License and others of that ilk.
      However, what I am getting at is a mindset that says: “I defined XXX and that’s how it should stay”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*